- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 02:13, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
- Austen Brassard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Falls short of WP:NHOCKEY. T.C.Haliburtontalk nerdy to me 02:08, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: Yet another in a string of hundreds of NN articles created by a now-indeffed editor with a long history of defying notability standards. Fails NHOCKEY, no sign of passing the GNG. Ravenswing 16:03, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Fails to meet NHOCKEY or GNG. Can be created if/when the player becomes notable. -DJSasso (talk) 18:10, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete fails the notability guidelines for hockey players.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:08, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.