Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Constantia Oomen (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. a suitable case for honoring the subject's wishes DGG ( talk ) 04:19, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Constantia Oomen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Individual does not appear to meet notability guidelines, maybe borderline at best. The author herself has requested deletion (WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE) in the page history. Sro23 (talk) 23:20, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:22, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:22, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as I know I had encountered this recently but I'm not finding exactly where; by all means there's frankly nothing actually convincing and regardless I would've PRODed also, nothing actually substantial. SwisterTwister talk 07:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, please delete, old and outdated. By author: Constantia Oomen (August 1, 2016) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThroughTheWindow (talk • contribs) 20:08, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable writer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:42, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.