Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lexprompt WRITE

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:57, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Lexprompt WRITE

Lexprompt WRITE (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is absolutely no credible claim of significance for this software. But it is technically not eligible for A7, so sending it to AFD. A previous draft Draft:Lexprompt WRITE was declined at AFC. I am unable to find any significant coverage in reliable independent sources. This is simply a plug-in for MS Word which has been recently launched. WP:TOOSOON and clearly not notable at this point. -- Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:21, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:21, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:21, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:21, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

• Delete per nom - David Gerard (talk) 09:44, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
• Delete per nominator, no claim of significance. Ayub407^talk 14:15, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
• Delete and I frankly am nearly speedying as G11, it's blatant PR but I would also not be surprised if we'll need G4 in the future. SwisterTwister talk 04:22, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
• Delete as discussed. If the company in the future, say, does more product, or appears in more in-depth coverage, maybe company might be notable. But not every app. W Nowicki (talk) 19:30, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.